llms-txt

Kinship Hub System

Treating software projects as beings in networks of relations — where every directory carries identity, lineage, responsibilities, and accountability to human and more-than-human kin.


Core Principle

Under the Kinship Hub protocol, each directory is a being-with-a-role:

This is not metaphor. It is a structural reorientation grounded in Indigenous kinship law, Shawn Wilson’s research as ceremony, and the Four/Six Rs of Indigenous research.


The KINSHIP.md File

Every kinship hub carries a KINSHIP.md — a living ceremonial charter that states:

Section Purpose
Identity and Purpose What this place tends and offers
Lineage and Place Ancestors, descendants, siblings, related hubs
Human and Collective Relations People, communities, consent agreements
More-than-Human Relations Lands, waters, beings, cosmological connections
Responsibilities and the Rs Concrete practices for each of the Six Rs
Protocols and Boundaries Access, sovereignty, safety, consent
Accountability and Review Stewardship, feedback loops, review rhythm
Tensions and Contradictions Unresolved questions held openly
Ceremony, Story, and Memory Narrative beats, relational events
Change Log (Relational) Meaning of changes, not just mechanics

What We Mean by Relationship

Relationality, not a relational database: a thing is known through its relationships, and those relationships carry responsibility on both sides. In Shawn Wilson’s words, “An Indigenous research paradigm is relational and maintains relational accountability” (Research Is Ceremony, 2008, p. 71). Definition and sources: llms-relationality.md.

At the Scale of a Specification

Below the repository, every specification folder in rispecs/ has a kin file, <topic>.kin.md. It says who and what the specification is in relationship with:

It also says what each relationship asks of us. Agents write it with the first spec, keep it true, and read it before acting.

When a relationship is out of balance, it is fixed where the relationship lives, not only in the local text. Wilson tells how re-translating Cora’s grandfather’s words “may have helped to correct the misinformation, but it would not have restored the relationship” (p. 78).

Protocol: llms-rispecs-kinship.md.


Key Behaviors

For AI Companions

When working within a Kinship Hub:

  1. Ask before inventing relations — derive from user descriptions, existing docs, and code structure
  2. Treat refactors as relational changes — update lineage, append to change log with relational meaning
  3. Respect local voice — preserve user’s own language for communities, teachings, places
  4. Hold unresolved tensions — record in Tensions section rather than smoothing over
  5. Never auto-regenerate — KINSHIP.md is a living charter, not a checklist

Anti-Patterns to Avoid


Integration

Framework Connection
Creative Orientation Defines desired relational outcomes vs. current relational reality
Structural Tension Diagnoses advancing vs. oscillating patterns in care and reciprocity
Narrative Craft Beats capture relational events; referenced from KINSHIP.md
Performance Truth MMOT for relational discrepancies — expectation vs. delivery in care
RISE Framework Extracts kinship-relevant specs when reverse-engineering systems; every spec folder has a kin file

Key Sources