Treating software projects as beings in networks of relations — where every directory carries identity, lineage, responsibilities, and accountability to human and more-than-human kin.
Under the Kinship Hub protocol, each directory is a being-with-a-role:
This is not metaphor. It is a structural reorientation grounded in Indigenous kinship law, Shawn Wilson’s research as ceremony, and the Four/Six Rs of Indigenous research.
KINSHIP.md FileEvery kinship hub carries a KINSHIP.md — a living ceremonial charter that states:
| Section | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Identity and Purpose | What this place tends and offers |
| Lineage and Place | Ancestors, descendants, siblings, related hubs |
| Human and Collective Relations | People, communities, consent agreements |
| More-than-Human Relations | Lands, waters, beings, cosmological connections |
| Responsibilities and the Rs | Concrete practices for each of the Six Rs |
| Protocols and Boundaries | Access, sovereignty, safety, consent |
| Accountability and Review | Stewardship, feedback loops, review rhythm |
| Tensions and Contradictions | Unresolved questions held openly |
| Ceremony, Story, and Memory | Narrative beats, relational events |
| Change Log (Relational) | Meaning of changes, not just mechanics |
Relationality, not a relational database: a thing is known through its relationships, and those relationships carry responsibility on both sides. In Shawn Wilson’s words, “An Indigenous research paradigm is relational and maintains relational accountability” (Research Is Ceremony, 2008, p. 71). Definition and sources: llms-relationality.md.
Below the repository, every specification folder in rispecs/ has a kin file, <topic>.kin.md. It says who and what the specification is in relationship with:
It also says what each relationship asks of us. Agents write it with the first spec, keep it true, and read it before acting.
When a relationship is out of balance, it is fixed where the relationship lives, not only in the local text. Wilson tells how re-translating Cora’s grandfather’s words “may have helped to correct the misinformation, but it would not have restored the relationship” (p. 78).
Protocol: llms-rispecs-kinship.md.
When working within a Kinship Hub:
KINSHIP.md is a living charter, not a checklist| Framework | Connection |
|---|---|
| Creative Orientation | Defines desired relational outcomes vs. current relational reality |
| Structural Tension | Diagnoses advancing vs. oscillating patterns in care and reciprocity |
| Narrative Craft | Beats capture relational events; referenced from KINSHIP.md |
| Performance Truth | MMOT for relational discrepancies — expectation vs. delivery in care |
| RISE Framework | Extracts kinship-relevant specs when reverse-engineering systems; every spec folder has a kin file |